<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Earlybird Applications - Forum Topic: Contact Alarm invisible status</title>
<link>http://forum.earlybirdapplications.com/</link>
<description>Just another bbPress community</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:48:28 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>seboslaw on "Contact Alarm invisible status"</title>
<link>http://forum.earlybirdapplications.com/topic/contact-alarm-invisible-status#post-42</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>seboslaw</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">42@http://forum.earlybirdapplications.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi hellboy,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'm sorry, but this is not the case. It's due to Skype's status messaging nature. If a contact is online and goes invisible, it will appear to ContactAlarm as if the contact went offline. When the user goes from invisible to any online status (e.g. &#34;away&#34; or &#34;online&#34;), ContactAlarm will assume that the user has come &#34;online&#34;.&#60;br /&#62;
In fact, it doesn't differ from the way you as a user experience your contacts' status changes to &#34;invisible&#34; and back.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>hellboy on "Contact Alarm invisible status"</title>
<link>http://forum.earlybirdapplications.com/topic/contact-alarm-invisible-status#post-41</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hellboy</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">41@http://forum.earlybirdapplications.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;before buying this wonderful app, i wanted to inquire if the invisible status is logged in contact alarm as well?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks in advance
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
